<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Think Locally &#187; TurnHere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loladex.com/tag/turnhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loladex.com</link>
	<description>The Loladex Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MojoPages: Early impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.loladex.com/2007/05/25/mojopages-early-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.loladex.com/2007/05/25/mojopages-early-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MojoPages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TurnHere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yelp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loladex.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/mojopages-early-impressions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I start: Why am I even reviewing competitors of Loladex? Because I need to gauge their strength; writing is how I think, and a review helps focus my mind. Also, I believe that the local/social movement is, to paraphrase &#8230; <a href="http://www.loladex.com/2007/05/25/mojopages-early-impressions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I start: Why am I even reviewing competitors of Loladex?</p>
<p>Because I need to gauge their strength; writing is how I think, and a review helps focus my mind.</p>
<p>Also, I believe that the local/social movement is, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/quotes">to paraphrase Ah-nuld</a>, a learning computer. I toss my praise &amp; criticism into the mix with an expectation that it&#8217;ll help raise quality across the category.</p>
<p>(In other words, I&#8217;m not doing this just to slam competitors — honest.)</p>
<p>So anyway, <a href="http://www.mojopages.com/">MojoPages</a> is another &#8220;Local 2.0&#8243; rate-and-review site that has launched lately with the <em>de rigeur</em> beta label and a stated goal of being &#8220;the evolution of the Yellow Pages.&#8221; It doesn&#8217;t seem to have gotten any traction so far, but the Great Mentioner insists it&#8217;s a contender.</p>
<p>MojoPages certainly is an ambitious site. It launched with a whole mess of social-networking features: Friends, lists, groups, questions, small talk (suggested topic: &#8220;How is your day going?&#8221;), an e-mail system, and more. Its raw functionality builds on, and I guess trumps, the standard suite established by sites like <a href="http://www.yelp.com/">Yelp</a>.</p>
<p>Its general approach is post-Yelpy, too, with plenty of attaboys and &#8220;First to Review&#8221; labels.</p>
<p>MojoPages tries to distinguish itself, however, with a focus on video and a more structured &amp; granular take on reviews: Rather than giving a business a single rating, for instance, you give it a Zagat-like three ratings — for value, service and quality. And rather than a single text blob, you can fill out CitySearch-like &#8220;pros&#8221; and &#8220;cons&#8221; sections.</p>
<p><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_Ipxi-PNt4YE/Rlc30C7ywjI/AAAAAAAAABo/6ThFnQS-28I/s1600-h/mojo.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_Ipxi-PNt4YE/Rlc30C7ywjI/AAAAAAAAABo/6ThFnQS-28I/s400/mojo.jpg" style="float:left;cursor:hand;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" /></a>There are some things to like about MojoPages.</p>
<p>First off, the logo icon is clever and communicates the value proposition: The classic Yellow Pages icon, except with a thumbs-up instead of walking fingers. I like it.</p>
<p>And the focus on video, while it hasn&#8217;t been rewarded with much non-staff participation, could be worthwhile if they can get users to play along.</p>
<p><em>[Aside: I think they're wrong to ask for "video reviews." Postable video reviews are too much work to produce, duplicative of the written reviews, and generally low quality. Meanwhile, a simple pan around a restaurant with minimal (or no) narration, using a camera phone, can be immensely useful — as demonstrated on some of the MojoPages reviews.This is how I think user-generated video will flourish in local: As supplemental material, like photos, rather than as an alternative to text reviews. Some users will do complete video reviews, as several MojoPages staffers attempt, and companies like <a href="http://www.turnhere.com/ourwork.html">TurnHere</a> will distribute professional video, but they'll be a minority.]</em></p>
<p>Meanwhile, the business listings on MojoPages have some nice features, such as a business-specific link to the Better Business Bureau.</p>
<p>Alas, in almost every case the BBB link produces no result because there&#8217;s no matching BBB report. They should write a little spider that helps them remove all but the productive links, or see if the BBB will give them a feed.</p>
<p>Beyond these positives, I found the site to be cluttered with redundant features. The profusion of social tools is serious overkill, and unfortunately emphasizes how little participation they&#8217;re getting. (Class? Anyone? <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2luAeK0Tuu8">Anyone</a>?)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether transparency is a good idea at startup, but the site allows us see how many people have joined lately (anywhere from 0 to 10 daily) and guess at how many have joined in total (hundreds but not thousands). They&#8217;re probably not helped by an architecture that seems unfriendly to search engines.</p>
<p>Launching with a site that seems deserted is <a href="http://blog.loladex.com/2007/04/whole-chicken-and-egg-thing.html">an occupational hazard of Web 2.0</a>, but MojoPages has been up for a few months now and doesn&#8217;t seem to be building steam.</p>
<p>The result is a &#8220;Small Talk&#8221; section that shows only one post in the last month — and that from a staffer. The feature is one of several that MojoPages should simply shut down, if only to clarify where they want users to start.</p>
<p>MojoPages also has the typical range of beta issues, from misspellings to confusing navigation. Mainly, though, it&#8217;s trying to be too many things at the same time: Yelp <strong><em>and</em></strong> Facebook <strong><em>and</em></strong> YouTube, all in a muddle.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s early days, and I&#8217;m sure MojoPages will sharpen its focus. Its founders, whom I don&#8217;t know, seem to be enthusiastic. But for now, the overall effect is to make me appreciate what Yelp has achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.loladex.com/2007/05/25/mojopages-early-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

